<html>
Oh, and there has been a bit of discussion on the Vectorlist about the seller...not all of it positive...recommend you pick up the unit if possible seems to be the suggestion I would consider. I've included a clipping from there at the bottom of this message, names edited for privacy.<br>
<br>
John :-#)#<br>
<br>
At 12:33 PM 11/29/1999 -0600, tom mcclintock wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite cite>Ok:<br>
<br>
I'm in the process of acquiring that orange Atari test fixture that was<br>
just on eBay, and I'm wondering who has any documentation on this? Or<br>
even the correct name? John Robertson - I know you have one of these,<br>
and I know it's strictly for raster games, but what else can I do with<br>
it? Am I correct in assuming it is basically a test rig? Here's a link<br>
to the auction:<br>
(http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=205478827)<br>
<br>
<br>
tom</blockquote><br>
<br>
To: "'vectorlist...<br>
Subject: RE: "untested" PCBs...<br>
<br>
Ahhhhh! These could be the same Williams boards he owes me from a year ago!!<br>
<br>
50% of the time is not good enough for me.<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
M<br>
<br>
> ----------<br>
> From: <x-tab> </x-tab>S<br>
> Reply To: <x-tab> </x-tab>vectorlist<br>
> Sent: <x-tab> </x-tab>Tuesday, 30 November 1999 10:39<br>
> To: <x-tab> </x-tab>'vectorlist<br>
> Subject: <x-tab> </x-tab>RE: "untested" PCBs...<br>
> <br>
> Why do you keep refering to the KrazyKatt1 as "Jan". It's actually Adam <br>
> Judd (her husband) who's using her name and account since his rep is worth<br>
> "mud" <br>
> (or another similar substance) ever since his misdealings on RGVAC/M. <br>
> <br>
> This guy owes me some Williams boards from a deal on RGVAC <br>
> over 1 year ago. He supposedly sent me a refund but that's mysteriously <br>
> gotten lost in the mail too ... TWICE! ... see the pattern? <br>
> <br>
> Buyer Beware!! <br>
> <br>
> I also think it's naive to believe the feedback ratings on Ebay. Case in<br>
> point, <br>
> this seller!! I will admit, however, that 50% of the time he seems honest<br>
> <br>
> and friendly thru Email but I'll be glad when I don't have to deal with<br>
> him anymore. <br>
> <br>
> S<br>
> CANADA <br>
> <br>
> p.s. I'm glad he's loosing packages to you Yankees as well. So much for <br>
> his across the border and customs excuses ... time to write another Email <br>
> to tycho780. :-( Wish me luck! <br>
> <br>
> <x-tab> </x-tab>-----Original Message----- <br>
> From: E<br>
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 1999 6:07 PM <br>
> To: vectorlist<br>
> Subject: Re: "untested" PCBs... <br>
> <br>
> <x-tab> </x-tab>>But there's a difference between NOT giving negative feedback and a<br>
> HUGE <br>
> >list of EXELLENT, A+++, WOULD TRADE AGAIN, FAST SHIPMENT blablabla <br>
> >ect... That just don't add up to me... <br>
> > <br>
> >For example. If everybody is unhappy with, lets say, MR X, there might <br>
> >not be negative feedback, but there IS a lot of hoorays... How come? <br>
> <br>
> <x-tab> </x-tab>Actually, there are a lot fewer hoorays than you might expect. Jan<br>
> has sold <br>
> several hundred items on eBay (>200 in the last month alone) to a couple <br>
> hundred different people but only has positive feedback from seventy or so<br>
> <br>
> unique people. That means that her feedback percentage is pretty low <br>
> relative to the amount of stuff she has sold. Her repeat feedback <br>
> percentage is also quite low. Since she is friendly and does do enough in <br>
> the way of service to avoid outright negative feedback (replacing parts, <br>
> shipments, etc.), most folks who have slightly unpleasant experience just <br>
> don't leave any feedback at all. <br>
> <br>
> <x-tab> </x-tab>-E<br>
> <br>
> <br>
</html>
Received on Mon Nov 29 23:03:13 1999
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 02 2003 - 18:40:56 EST