RE: More fluke troubles!

From: John Robertson <jrr_at_flippers.com>
Date: Fri Oct 26 2001 - 12:31:28 EDT

<x-flowed>
They are 128's and here is the ROMSUM (Thanks to Bill Ung for this program)
checksums:

File 128C900.U9 == 0x995C [128]

File 128C901.U19 == 0x5F11 [128]

File 128C902.U21 == 0x2F6C [128]

John :-#)#

At 09:08 AM 10/26/01, you wrote:
>Can anyone verify for sure what type of roms the fluke 9010a takes? I think
>the consensus is they use 27128's. I'm having a hard time getting the
>correct checksums off of any of my 3 roms, that's why I'm still wondering.
>It seems unlikely that they'd all be bad. I get two that read 8000 and one
>that reads something like C000.
>
>Matt
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dave Langley [mailto:robotron@ntlworld.com]
>Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 8:41 AM
>To: TechToolsList@flippers.com
>Subject: More fluke troubles!
>
>
>Hi all ...
>
>Well since my 9100A died I managed to get a 9010, alas I am doomed to be
>the keeper of lots of dead fluke hardware as the 9010 is completely dead!
>
>The PSU tests out OK, but I've not looked at anything else. Also I noticed
>it does not have the RS232 option ... if I get it working has anyone got
>one of these for sale?
>
>Now onto the pods ... the 6802 and 8085 pods were both shipped without the
>cable in the self test socket. Guess what both have a pin broken off :o(
>
>Has anyone ever replaced these ribbons/headers with a home made effort?
>
>PS I have not forgotten about those who wanted the 9100 software but I
>cannot currently copy it. It's being sent onto someone who can for
>distribution.
>
>
>Dave Langley
>www.robotron-2084.co.uk
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE from techtoolslist, send a message with "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the
> message body to: techtoolslist-request@flippers.com. Please direct other
> questions, comments, or problems to jrr@flippers.com.

</x-flowed>
Received on Fri Oct 26 09:59:38 2001

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 02 2003 - 18:40:38 EST