TechTools Archives: Re: 9010A signatures

From: John Robertson <jrr_at_flippers.com>
Date: Tue Jan 29 2002 - 18:45:10 EST

<x-html>
<html>
Best in unformatted text, then more people can play with them. Also the
program editor uses normal text not MS RichText or other
formats... 
John :-#)# 
At 06:29 PM 29/01/2002 -0500, Kev wrote: 
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>I agree
with Dave, probably best to just collect the Fluke Signatures & run
with it. 
  
I don't know who is hosting the stuff. 
I'm collecting it.  The files I made are in a Word 97 doc with Excel
spreadsheet pasted in.  The Files that Peter made are in a Word 97
doc with a table.  I know that Word isn't the prefered format but
I'm not anxious to covert them over to HTML.  Any other suggested
formats? 
  
Kev 
 
<dl>
<dd>  

<dd>'Lo again,
<dd> 
<dd> I'm going to be repairing a bunch a Space Duel PCBs
this
<dd>weekend so I'll be set up to get some ROM signatures.
Who
<dd>is collecting (hosting) these?
<dd> 
<dd> On a side note, I looked at the 9010's LEARN code
again
<dd>today to see if it makes any sense. It's Hell in binary. A
single
<dd>pass through the main 'loop' takes about 1118
instruction
<dd>executions (43 pages of emulator trace with 26
instructions
<dd>per page). I think I'm going to put this aside forever and
just
<dd>use a list of 9010 style ROM Signatures. There's
enough
<dd>of us out there with 9010's so that we can probably cover
the
<dd>most popular boardsets.
<dd> 
<dd>Dave
</dl></blockquote></html>

</x-html>
Received on Tue Jan 29 15:52:40 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 02 2003 - 18:40:39 EST