Kev,
Being a fellow 9100 user, I'm interested in solving the signature
problem too.
I'm new to the TechTools list and I may be covering stuff you guys have
been over before and be stating the blindingly obvious, but here goes...
If the 9100 does in fact use a CRC algorithm, then there are only so
many polynomials that are useful. As a start, trying out CRC-12, CRC-16
and CRC-CCITT that are all 16-bit orientated polynomials might yeild a
match with what the 9100 generates.
As far as I know, the pods themselves do the signatures in the 9010
configuration. Here, one would think a disassembly of the pod ROM would
yield what we need or failing that a simple driver in MAME that runs the
pod code would do the trick?
Regards,
Paul.
Kev wrote:
>
> >Kev has raised a good point about the lack of 9100 orientated info around..
> >plenty of 9010, but as any good 9100 owner would know, the rom signatures
> do
> >differ..
> >
> >I have a stack of sigs taken from a whole host of pcbs, all on some rather
> >battle-worn notepads that i do need to type up and put in a
> >printable/readable format...
> >
> >I seem to remember John saying somethign about a fluke resource on his
> site,
> >but the exact details escape me this minute..
> >
Received on Fri May 31 17:08:12 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 02 2003 - 18:40:44 EST