Re: BUxxx

From: Jess Askey <jess_at_magenta.com>
Date: Wed Sep 03 1997 - 13:48:58 EDT

Clay Cowgill wrote:
>
> Do any of you have the actual specs/ratings for the BU406D, BU409, BU207,
> BU208, and BU209?
>
> BU208's and BU207's seem to indicate that the ratings increase in this
> order: BU209, BU208, BU207. (So a BU208 is an OK sub for a 209 and a 207
> is an ok sub for the 207.) However, I've never seen "real" specs on these,
> and the only numbers I have seen were in a catalog, so I'm a little
> concerned about guessing wrong.
>
> (Since 207's and 208's seem relatively common compared to a BU209 I want to
> see if they're "safe" to substitute or not.)
>
> Anyone know the answer, or have access to the specs?

Doesn't SGS Thompson make them. If so they have really good .pdf specs
for everthing at www.st.com . The BU406D isn't there but the 406 was
last time I looked.
  

-- 
Jess M. Askey                  Unofficial Atari Game Page
ESLB/The Audio Analyst       http://links.magenta.com/havoc
509 S. 2nd Street Unit B
Laramie WY 82070             Shop: (307)721-9001
Received on Wed Sep 3 10:46:31 1997

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 01 2003 - 00:32:56 EDT