RE: Star Wars/Wells Gardner 6100 Problem

And the new kits are easier to install (less prep work).
If you buy an assembled one, all you have to do is solder on the 2 wires,
straighten out the standoffs and drop it in (after you remove the old parts
first)

-jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Clay Cowgill [mailto:ClayC@diamondmm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 1999 2:11 PM
To: 'vectorlist@mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu'
Subject: RE: Star Wars/Wells Gardner 6100 Problem

Yeah, I think there's a good chance that the low voltage section just
failed on your monitor. (It *could* have taken out a deflection
transistor or two, but I've seen far more bad low voltage circuits than
dead deflection transistors...)

If you buy one pre-assembled installation shouldn't take very long at
all.

-Clay

> ----------
> From: W. Dennis Shirk[SMTP:dshirk@godfrey.com]
> Reply To: vectorlist@mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu
> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 1999 3:39 PM
> To: vectorlist@mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu
> Subject: Re: Star Wars/Wells Gardner 6100 Problem
>
> Clay, would the Low Voltage section of the board be a good place to
> start
> with the troubleshooting? I have read up on Anders Knudsen's LV2000
> replacement for the low voltage section which is supposed to fix all
> kinds
> of problems. BTW, the URL for the LV2000 is
> http://www.diac.com/%7Ejeffh/lv2000/
>
> Dennis
> http://gameroom.godfrey.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clay Cowgill <ClayC@diamondmm.com>
> To: 'vectorlist@mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu'
> <vectorlist@mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu>
> Date: Wednesday, February 03, 1999 12:26 PM
> Subject: RE: Star Wars/Wells Gardner 6100 Problem
>
>
> >This is what I wrote in the manual:
> >
> >"(It's technically 'safer' to switch with the power off anyway, since
> >it's less likely to damage your monitor if the CPU doesn't reset
> >properly. Your Mileage May Vary. If in doubt, turn the game off
> before
> >switching.)"
> >
> >I had one monitor blow the low-voltage section by switching on the
> fly
> >when the Vector Generator crashed (back at the end of 1996). Since
> then
> >I've done all sorts of horrible things to the boards and monitor and
> >never had a problem again. To be safe I'd "officially" say turn it
> off
> >first, then switch. Unofficially there's *lots* of people switching
> on
> >the fly and I've never heard of another monitor die with switching as
> a
> >likely culprit.
> >
> >There's always a possibility that Dennis' monitor was just going to
> do
> >it's Rutger Hauer/Blade Runner impression that day anyway ("Time...
> to
> >die...") and it would have konked out when he turned the power off
> and
> >on again too...
> >
> >-Clay
> >
> >> ----------
> >> From: Tom Cloud[SMTP:computerspace@hotmail.com]
> >> Reply To: vectorlist@mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 1999 11:38 AM
> >> To: vectorlist@mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu
> >> Subject: RE: Star Wars/Wells Gardner 6100 Problem
> >>
> >> Clay,
> >>
> >> So I understand this then...is to NOT switch between the games with
> >> the power on? I must confess, I've been doing that. When I read
> the
> >> message below, the hair on the back of my neck stood straight up!!
> >>
> >> So, is it ok to switch games with the power on or do I run the risk
> >> of damaging my monitor?
> >>
> >> Thanks for the info.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Tom Cloud
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
From: Clay Cowgill <ClayC@diamondmm.com>
> >> >To: "'vectorlist@mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu'"
> >> > <vectorlist@mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu>
> >> >Subject: RE: Star Wars/Wells Gardner 6100 Problem
> >> >Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 17:46:03 -0800
> >> >Reply-To: vectorlist@mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> A couple games later, he switched it back to ESB, and it still
> did
> >> not
> >> >> display video, so he switched back to Star Wars, and now that
> was
> >> not
> >> >> displaying video either.
> >> >>
> >> >For what it's worth, this is what killed my monitor when I was
> >> *first*
> >> >working on the kits-- hence the warning about switching with the
> game
> >> >on.
> >> >
> >> >Clay's techy idea on what can happen:
> >> >
> >> >I think you can switch and still have the code land in a segment
> that
> >> >refreshes the watchdog, but the vector generator crashes.
> >> >Max-deflection for very long = dead monitor. Someday I should
> >> probably
> >> >redesign the kit to have the bank-selection switch go into a PAL
> and
> >> >then have the PAL yank reset for a few clocks after the switch
> >> changes
> >> >states. I'd want to *really* fix those nasty old 2212 NOVRAMs at
> the
> >> >same time though by replacing it with some kind of EEPROM, so the
> >> >project gets larger and I keep putting it off...
> >> >
> >> >-Clay
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________________
> >> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> >>
> >>
>
>
Received on Wed Feb 3 15:23:18 1999