> It's quite a bit more primitive than the 8051. I believe the 8051 has
> a 16 bit pointer (The 'dptr'?) that can be used as a data stack, not
Nope. The stack is internal RAM only unfortunately iwht amaximum of 256
bytes.
> to mention a separate stack pointer, the ability to address external
> memory (RAM and ROM), a von neuman architecture that allows for easy
> access to data tables in code space. It can easily handle a "C"
Uh... the 8051 is Harvard, not Von Neuman.
> >buffer. The only reason that's done now is because that's what all OS's
> >want. A simple add+add+add+add+add/clip would work nicely (and does, I
> >might add).
> That's what I figure and what it sounds like Clay was planning on
> doing. If you start with smaller samples you can avoid the 'clip'.
You still want to clip anyway, though. If you have your samples at around
95% of maximum it works out great. Just don't do the add and divide
approach.
-->Neil
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Bradley Synthcom home : http://www.synthcom.com
Synthcom Systems, Inc. "Mechanical engineers build weapons. Civil engineers
ICQ # 29402898 build targets." - Unknown
Received on Wed Jun 23 16:14:15 1999
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 01 2003 - 00:31:43 EDT