There is only one installed. Using both makes things a little
too tight and roller efficiency is compromised ;-) The angle of
the control panel keeps it bottomed on the stud.
The 'stud' is aluminum and projects about 3/16's of an inch.
It has a diameter of about 3/16 of an inch on the head whilst
the shaft of the 'stud' is about 1/8"
Jon Raiford wrote:
>
> I was pretty sure there were 2 of these (one for each end)..
> Now I'll have to go down and check.. I would take a picture
> for you, but I left my camera at work. BTW, my roller was
> cracking all to hell when I got it and I had to break the
> corner pieces off the case and glue them back on. Is this
> typical? Or was some numb-nuts just trying to screw it on
> too tight? Also, I'll go for 3 sets of rollers if/when
> they are done. (TomW or Callan: any word on repro-ing the
> cpo's? I could use 3 of them as well) FWIW, I still plan
> on repro-ing the side art, but I haven't been able to get
> near a machine that has it for scanning.. Any ideas on the
> best way to scan it? I originally thought a digital camera
> would work with a lot of editing, but now I'm thinking a
> hand scanner might work better.. My flatbed scanner has
> raised edges so it would be impossible to get a focused
> image :(
>
> Jon
>
> At 03:09 PM 7/9/99 -0500, you wrote:
> >Description "178116-005 #6 x .31" drive stud".
> >IF the panel slopes and IF the stud goes in the side
> >nearest the player my guess would be that gravity holds
> >the roller against the stud and the stud just keeps
> >the roller from scraping against the housing.
> >
> >In the drawing the stud appears to be slotted, like a
> >board standoff. My guess is it IS a plastic standoff.
> >#6 would be the hole size it fits in to and .31" is probably
> >length, but length of WHAT I don't know.
Received on Fri Jul 9 16:09:43 1999
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 01 2003 - 00:31:27 EDT