>> Not widely known platformss or too limited. I'd much rahter have a 6809
>> driving a vector display than a 6502, which is pretty much what vector
>> hardware is. ;-)
> Star Wars hardware? :) Curious, what's the problem with a 6502 for a vector
> hardware platform from today's coding standpoint?
Programming the 6502 is not fun when you've programmed the 6809. And
programming a 6809 is no fun when you've programmed a 68K or an ARM. It's
all relative. ;-) But in my opinon the 6502 is far worse than any chip
I've ever programmed. Even the 8051.
Plus, to be honest, the days of programmers with the ability to cram
cool/good/extensive functionality into tiny architectures like this are
long gone. Unless they have megabytes of free memory and a full on
operating system and debuggers available for free, they're not interested.
Kinda sad.
-->Neil
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Bradley "The true axis of evil in America is the brilliance of
Synthcom Systems, Inc. our marketing combined with the stupidity of our
people.." - Bill Maher
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
** Unsubscribe, subscribe, or view the archives at http://www.vectorlist.org
** Please direct other questions, comments, or problems to chris@westnet.com
Received on Thu Jan 20 16:51:06 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 20 2005 - 17:50:01 EST