Re: Tech WG6100

I will admit I have heard folks argue for and against the "use" or more
specifically "need" for the LV2000, especially when dealing with the
newer 6100 designs, such as the 6102. This is further true when the
additional "fixes" or updates are applied to it as I recently did to mine
(I do have an LV2000, but haven't installed it).

Scott C.

Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Scott Caldwell wrote:
>
>
>> What about WG6102 monitors that already have that built in (or most of it
>> anyway)?
>>
>
> I wouldn't say the 102 has any of it built in. The lv2000 is a complete
> redesign of the low voltage section with a modern semiconductor. It doesn't
> duplicate the protections of the 102, it avoids the need for them.
>
>
> ==========================================================
> Chris Candreva -- chris@westnet.com -- (914) 967-7816
> WestNet Internet Services of Westchester
> http://www.westnet.com/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ** Unsubscribe, subscribe, or view the archives at http://www.vectorlist.org
> ** Please direct other questions, comments, or problems to chris@westnet.com
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
** Unsubscribe, subscribe, or view the archives at http://www.vectorlist.org
** Please direct other questions, comments, or problems to chris@westnet.com
Received on Mon Aug 28 22:06:35 2006