Re: Tech WG6100

Does LV2000 actually replace the entire deflection board, or would it still
be needed?

----- Original Message -----
From: <solarfox@texas.net>
To: <vectorlist@vectorlist.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 4:30 AM
Subject: Re: VECTOR: Tech WG6100

> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:06:35 -0500, you wrote:
>
>>I will admit I have heard folks argue for and against the "use" or more
>>specifically "need" for the LV2000, especially when dealing with the
>>newer 6100 designs, such as the 6102. This is further true when the
>>additional "fixes" or updates are applied to it as I recently did to mine
>>(I do have an LV2000, but haven't installed it).
>
> I like to take the "belt-and-suspenders" approach, myself. The LV2000
> *might* not be necessary in all circumstances... but it can't hurt. :)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "In ancient times, they believed that there were only four kinds of
> matter:
> Earth, Water, Air, and Fire. Nowadays, of course, we know that there are
> actually four states of matter: Solid, Liquid, Gas, and Plasma. Thank God
> for progress!" ---(Kelvin Throop III)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> solarfox@DON'TMESSWITHtexas.net (Gary Akins
> jr.)
> http://lonestar.texas.net/~solarfox
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ** Unsubscribe, subscribe, or view the archives at
> http://www.vectorlist.org
> ** Please direct other questions, comments, or problems to
> chris@westnet.com
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
** Unsubscribe, subscribe, or view the archives at http://www.vectorlist.org
** Please direct other questions, comments, or problems to chris@westnet.com
Received on Tue Aug 29 06:07:47 2006