9010A signature analysis option

From: Peter Fyfe <peter_at_bombjack.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Tue Jan 22 2002 - 17:11:25 EST

<x-html>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4134.600" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Folks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Has anyone used the SA option on the Fluke
yet.&nbsp; I've been playing around with space invaders and the RAM failures
that are due to other TTL chips.&nbsp; It occured to me that when you loop on a
read instruction you get a fairly stable train of pulses on a lot of the IC's
which would make it ideal for SA.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Does anybody know if you can READ 2000
and&nbsp;LOOP on it and still use the Fluke for the SA.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Just wondering</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Peter</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>PS&nbsp; I do have some checksum data for various
boards, none of which has been verified.&nbsp; Pete Davies (Invadar) was going
to host these but if anyone is interested I can type then up and you can use
them at your leisure / risk.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

</x-html>
Received on Tue Jan 22 14:10:19 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 02 2003 - 18:40:39 EST