<x-html>
<html>
Is it not easier to just use a NOP fixture for the processor? Perhaps
some genius here could write a routine that happily steps through
each and every address line the same as a NOP does. This would work for
any pod then...handy!<br><br>
John:-#)#<br><br>
At 10:11 PM 22/01/2002 +0000, Peter Fyfe wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="arial" size=2>Folks,</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Has anyone used the SA option on the Fluke
yet. I've been playing around with space invaders and the RAM
failures that are due to other TTL chips. It occured to me that
when you loop on a read instruction you get a fairly stable train of
pulses on a lot of the IC's which would make it ideal for
SA.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Does anybody know if you can READ 2000 and LOOP
on it and still use the Fluke for the SA.</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Just wondering</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>Peter</font><br>
<br>
<font face="arial" size=2>PS I do have some checksum data for
various boards, none of which has been verified. Pete Davies
(Invadar) was going to host these but if anyone is interested I can type
then up and you can use them at your leisure /
risk.</font></blockquote></html>
</x-html>
Received on Tue Jan 29 11:12:36 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 02 2003 - 18:40:39 EST