Hi all, thought I'd have ago at trying the learn function on a working Taito
S.I. part II board set. After waiting (4 hrs!!) to complete, I go to view
the ram and it comes back 'no ram info' all the Rom, I/O info is there, just
no ram. What am I doing wrong?
Phil.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kev <KKlopp@erols.com>
To: Andy Welburn <warlords@ntlworld.com>; <TechToolsList@flippers.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:52 PM
Subject: Re: Fluke 9100 repository?
>
>
>
> >Kev has raised a good point about the lack of 9100 orientated info
around..
> >plenty of 9010, but as any good 9100 owner would know, the rom signatures
> do
> >differ..
> >
> >I have a stack of sigs taken from a whole host of pcbs, all on some
rather
> >battle-worn notepads that i do need to type up and put in a
> >printable/readable format...
> >
> >I seem to remember John saying somethign about a fluke resource on his
> site,
> >but the exact details escape me this minute..
> >
>
> ftp://ftp.flippers.com
>
> There is no list there yet. I do have some 9010A signatures that I've
> posted to the newslist before & had 2 other members respond & send in a
few
> more, with such paultry response I didn't pursue posting them.
>
> 9100 responses probably will be even lower in relationship to the number
of
> these.
>
> Most of the 9100 manuals that I know of are posted on the ftp site (if you
> have any not posted please let us know).
>
> 9100 software is the next focus, still trying to find a working copy of
the
> 9100 Autolearn program and cross compiler. And then I hope to start
writing
> some useful scripts.
>
> >i need reminding.. where are they, how can i add to them, and would there
> be
> >a html version instead of just a directory style listing?
> >
>
> I used either word 95/97 or Excel 95/97 documents. Text files would be
> better (or html).
>
> One question that I posted a few weeks ago is what method do 9100 owners
use
> to collect signatures? My firmware defaults to a step 2 method that I
reset
> to step 1 when I collect my signatures.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Kev
>
>
Received on Fri May 31 02:52:20 2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 02 2003 - 18:40:44 EST