<x-flowed>
This is going to sound real naive, but why not just slap two connectors
on a BASICstamp? The routines for sending the data to the Fluke is
already there. The circuit board is already there.
(Just a suggestion, I'll go hide under the coach while you all tell me
why that doesn't work).
Corey Stup wrote:
>
> Also being a microcontroller programmer (mostly with PICs), I agree to
> using the larger more advanced part with the built in hardware UART.
> Its just not worth trying to squeeze everything out of a lower
> capability part unless you are trying to save costs for thousands of
> units.
> I would be glad to help if a PIC is chosen with code (ASM or C) and
> testing. I have an ICE with pods for 16c5x, 16c6x and 16c7x.
>
> I have a Fluke Programmers keyboard and 2 programmers stations (ie,
> with video cards) for testing. I can also program nearly any
> microcontroller (Labtool-48) and can route out some proto boards with
> the PCB mill.
>
> I'm happy to help with this project.
>
>
>
>
>
</x-flowed>
Received on Wed Jun 04 12:53:28 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 02 2003 - 18:40:52 EST