Re: 9100 keyboard wedge (udpate 2)

Well I have no experience with microcontrollers of any nature. And the
circuit I found that started me on this path used a PIC, then I found the
atmell app notes. Figure if someone already has done the hard work I can
put the package together.

I bet ya the basic stamp would work fine. I just don't have one. :)

David
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rodger Boots" <rlboots@cedar-rapids.net>
To: <techtoolslist@flippers.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: 9100 keyboard wedge (udpate 2)

>
> This is going to sound real naive, but why not just slap two connectors
> on a BASICstamp? The routines for sending the data to the Fluke is
> already there. The circuit board is already there.
>
> (Just a suggestion, I'll go hide under the coach while you all tell me
> why that doesn't work).
>
>
> Corey Stup wrote:
>
> >
> > Also being a microcontroller programmer (mostly with PICs), I agree to
> > using the larger more advanced part with the built in hardware UART.
> > Its just not worth trying to squeeze everything out of a lower
> > capability part unless you are trying to save costs for thousands of
> > units.
> > I would be glad to help if a PIC is chosen with code (ASM or C) and
> > testing. I have an ICE with pods for 16c5x, 16c6x and 16c7x.
> >
> > I have a Fluke Programmers keyboard and 2 programmers stations (ie,
> > with video cards) for testing. I can also program nearly any
> > microcontroller (Labtool-48) and can route out some proto boards with
> > the PCB mill.
> >
> > I'm happy to help with this project.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Received on Wed Jun 04 23:56:42 2003