RE: [techtoolslist] 6800 -> 6502 fluke pod conversion

From: John Robertson <jrr_at_flippers.com>
Date: Wed Sep 10 2003 - 02:44:59 EDT

<x-flowed>
I was looking at building a RS-232 port for my collection of 9010A's but
haven't had the time...the problem is the hardware based ICs, I haven't
found a replacement for the original part that would allow me to push the
speed any faster - was thinking 120K would be nice ;-)

John :-#)#

At 02:00 AM 10/09/2003 -0500, Joe wrote:

>Looks like the major difference is PHI 0 and 2.
>
>The 2 are extremely close. All address and data lines are on the same
>pins. I believe op codes are the same. Definitely worth looking into.
>
>
>Still looking for a 9010a RS-232 module,
>JB
>-----Original Message-----
>From: John Robertson [mailto:jrr@flippers.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:49 PM
>To: techtoolslist@www.flippers.com
>Subject: Re: [techtoolslist] 6800 -> 6502 fluke pod conversion
>
>I haven't done it, but it sure looks easy to find out. Your 6800 pod has
>to
>have the jumpers though, and not all of them do.
>
>It might be nice to make it switchable...a 2532 and some extra gates and
>a
>toggle switch?
>
>John :-#)#
>
>At 11:29 PM 09/09/2003 +0100, Dave Langley wrote:
>
> >I was wondering ...
> >
> >Since the schematics for the 6502 pod show it can be jumpered to go
>from
> >6502 to 6800, has anyone ever converted a dedicated 6800 pod to 6502?
> >
> >I have a unit that I can try on, just wondering if anyone has actually
> >done this already to save me re-inventing the wheel?
> >
> >Thanks in advance for any input ....
> >
> >Dave Langley
> >www.robotron-2084.co.uk
> >
> >

</x-flowed>
Received on Wed Sep 10 00:04:14 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 02 2003 - 18:40:54 EST