Re: RASTER: FW: Using 8080 pod on Midway 8080 boards (Space Invaders)

Hmm, ok well that doesn't bode well for my pods.

I can't get anything close to a reliable memory test and no Run UUT success.
I often get pod power failure. This is on a known good working board set.

Both my pods have the short flat cables. I see another 8080 up on ebay with
a longer twisted pair style cable but they are asking $200 for it. No way I
am doing that at this point.

-----Original Message-----
From: techtoolslist-bounces@flippers.com
[mailto:techtoolslist-bounces@flippers.com] On Behalf Of John Robertson
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:15 PM
To: techtoolslist@flippers.com
Subject: Re: [Techtoolslist] RASTER: FW: Using 8080 pod on Midway 8080
boards (Space Invaders)

David Shoemaker wrote:
> What I am trying to figure out is are both my pods bad (which I doubt
> as two are behaving the same way) or is my 9010.
>

If you are wondering if the base (9010/9100) affects the Run UUT command the
answer is no. When the pod is in the RUN UUT mode it is entirely independent
from the base - other than it can be over-ridden with a command - it does
not talk to the base at all. This is covered somewhere in the manuals...
Some of the manuals are searchable - look up RUN UUT and see what is
written, pretty sure I've remembered it correctly. All the base does is tell
the CPU where the Reset Vector is, after that the pod is on it's own.

John :-#)#
> -----Original Message-----
> From: prvs=1763d5e072=ayeckley@sierralobo.com
> [mailto:prvs=1763d5e072=ayeckley@sierralobo.com] On Behalf Of Alex
> Yeckley
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:15 AM
> To: 'David Shoemaker'; 'Technical Tools Mail List'; jrr@flippers.com;
> rasterlist@vectorlist.org
> Subject: RE: [Techtoolslist] RASTER: FW: Using 8080 pod on Midway 8080
> boards (Space Invaders)
>
>
>> Do your pods have the twisted cable or the straight? Both mine have
>> the straight.
>>
>
> Our 8080 pods have the OEM twisted cables. Our 6502 pods (re: Clay's
> Tempest question) come in both twisted and the flat cables. I'm
> assuming the flat cable is a non-factory replacement item, but could
> be totally wrong about that. The 6502 pod that failed just happened
> to have had a flat cable but I'm confident the drive problem was
> unrelated; we found one specific driver output that wasn't going
sufficiently high once plugged into a "real"
> target board. It wasn't a general malaise of the address lines like
> you might expect from transmission line losses or higher EMI
> susceptibility due to the flat cable if that's what you are wondering.
>
>
>> Are you using a 9010 or a 9100 to drive the pod?
>>
>
> Both...
>
> Alex
> ----
> ayeckley@elektronforge.com
> www.elektronforge.com
>
>
>
>
>

--
John's Jukes Ltd. 2343 Main St., Vancouver, BC, Canada V5T 3C9 Call
(604)872-5757 or Fax 872-2010 (Pinballs, Jukes, VideoGames)
                 www.flippers.com
"Old pinballers never die, they just flip out"
_______________________________________________
Techtoolslist mailing list
Techtoolslist@flippers.com
http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/techtoolslist
FTP site is: ftp://ttl.arcadetech.org/TTL/Test_Equipment
Archive site: http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/techtoolslist/
_______________________________________________
Techtoolslist mailing list
Techtoolslist@flippers.com
http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/techtoolslist
FTP site is: ftp://ttl.arcadetech.org/TTL/Test_Equipment
Archive site: http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/techtoolslist/