Yeah, it would have made sense to go to RCA, IF they wanted hundreds of thousands of tubes. I suspect it was easier to deal with Richardson than RCA. Manufacturers have a
tendency to steer you to an authorized distributor instead of dealing direct. Makes it much easier for them.
Noel Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Feb 2000 12:11:13 Rodger Boots wrote:
> >For example, when Wells-Gardner decided to make their vector monitor, they got the
> >TUBES from Richardson.
>
> Wouldn't it have made more sense for WG to have bought directly from RCA, the original manufacturer of the tube? After all they built 10's of thousands of those monitors. ;-)
>
> I suspect they steer people to Richardson now because they are aware that Richardson sells hard to find tubes.
>
> Noel
>
> --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ** To UNSUBSCRIBE from vectorlist, send a message with "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the
> ** message body to vectorlist-request@synthcom.com. Please direct other
> ** questions, comments, or problems to neil@synthcom.com.
-- Windows: 32 bit graphical interface for a 16 bit patch for an 8 bit operating system written for a 4 bit processor by a 2 bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** To UNSUBSCRIBE from vectorlist, send a message with "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the ** message body to vectorlist-request@synthcom.com. Please direct other ** questions, comments, or problems to neil@synthcom.com.Received on Wed Feb 9 15:58:00 2000
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 01 2003 - 00:30:58 EDT