Re: Re[2]: 2N6259's

The point that was made to me is that this is not a standard feedback loop
as it is taken after the yoke. I don't know if it is a serious problem or
not, but I believe that testing it with a current limiting load might get
around the issues...

Where are the MJ15024's found?

John :-#)#

At 01:53 PM 08/10/2002 -0400, Mark Jenison wrote:

> > I have been informed that running the monitor without the yoke might not
>be
> > such a good idea for the GO8 monitor (it is OK I think for the Wells
> > Gardner), so I am going to experiment with a simple load - a pair of
>11watt
> > light bulbs (115V) in place of the yoke. These should allow a visual
> > indication of problems, and yet be self current limiting - the brighter
> > they get the higher their resistance - this should reduce the risk of
> > burning out driver transistors during test, yet allow the feedback to work
> > correctly.
>
>Ah, I think I understand what you are saying...there is a feedback line
>going from the output transistors to the custom chip, and based on that
>feedback, it does some "error correction"...and without it, it may be error
>correcting at it's max, so to speak. Is this the reason for putting a
>minimum load? I've been testing these monitors without the yoke plugged in
>also.
>
>--
>Mark Jenison
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>** To UNSUBSCRIBE from vectorlist, send a message with "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the
>** message body to vectorlist-request@synthcom.com. Please direct other
>** questions, comments, or problems to vectorlist-owner@synthcom.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
** To UNSUBSCRIBE from vectorlist, send a message with "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the
** message body to vectorlist-request@synthcom.com. Please direct other
** questions, comments, or problems to vectorlist-owner@synthcom.com.
Received on Tue Oct 8 13:06:13 2002