Re: 6100 LV issues

On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 18:52:24 -0500, "someotherguy"
<someotherguy@someotherplace.com> wrote:

>No offense intended, as I respect the opinions of several of the people who
>have replied...
>
>but what in the world did all of you do before the LV2000 existed? I think
>Brian's desire to not go that route is a legitimate and valid one. LV2000's
>certainly are not a necessity for a reliable WG 6100. Surely there are some
>folks who are willing to offer their experiences with repairing the original
>LV section. Fortunately, all of mine (so far) have been fairly easy fixes,
>so I'm not of much help on it.
>
>Here's hoping some people will step forward with the kind of info we used to
>see here in regards to keeping these monitors going.

Before the LV2000 I had a LV re-design of my own. I wire wrapped each one as I
needed them. The LV2000 is nicer, and I've replaced my wire wraps with it.

I also had a Tempest monitor that was reliable. I notice one day that while the
monitor was working fine, one of the zener diodes was crack in two. So how it
was working is anybodies guess. I figured it wasn't worth investigating, and
even though it had a nice screen and was fully functional, I replaced the LV
section. I didn't want to worry about it.

-Zonn

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
** To UNSUBSCRIBE from vectorlist, send a message with "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the
** message body to vectorlist-request@synthcom.com. Please direct other
** questions, comments, or problems to neil@synthcom.com.
Received on Thu Feb 7 16:01:04 2002